Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/692/2018 of J.URMILLA Vs B.Devika on 6 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 692/2018 Between: 1. J.URMILLA, 0CC- HOUSE MAKER, R/O. D.NO.3-33 BAZAR VEEDHI,

APHC010179962018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 692/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. J.URMILLA, 0CC- HOUSE MAKER, R/O. D.NO.3-33 BAZAR VEEDHI, KOTHAPETA, CHANDRAGIRI POST AND VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. B DEVIKA, EXECUTIVE OFFICER CUM PANCHAYAT SECRETARY THE THONDAWADA GRAMPANCHAYAT, THONDAWADA VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. P VENKATRAYALU, THE TAHSILDAR, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHANDRAGIRI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. B SIDDAMUNI, THE SARPANCH, THE THONDAWADA GRAMPANCHAYAT THONDAWADA VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondents for willful and deliberate violation of interim orders granted by this Honble Court in WPMPN0.8953 of 2015 in WP.N0.6722 of 2015 dated 18.03.2015 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V V SATISH

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

He present contempt case has been filed on the ground of violation of an interim order, dated 18.03.2015 in W.P.No.6722 of 2015.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main writ petition itself has been withdrawn on 03.08.2021 and nothing survives in this contempt case.

3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

Date: 07.03.2026 KA

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 692/2018 Date: 07.03.2026 KA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead