Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/235/2018 of NCR ESTATES PVT LTD Vs P.KARIMULLAH KHAN on 6 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 235/2018 Between: 1. NCR ESTATES PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR CHENCHU RAMANAIDU,
APHC010046942018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 235/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NCR ESTATES PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR CHENCHU RAMANAIDU, S/O. SAI BABA NAIDU.
...PETITIONER AND
1. P KARIMULLAH KHAN, The Sub-Registrar, Ongole, Prakasham District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent u/sec.10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act r/w Art. 215 of Constitution of India for willful violation and disobedience in implementing this Hon'ble Courts order dated 19-12-2017 in W.P.M.P.No.20269 of 2015 in W.P.No.15570/2015 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
This Court, by order, dated 09.12.2017 had directed the respondent to consider the registration of the document produced by the petitioner in accordance with the minutes, dated 17.07.2015 in relation to the Market Value Revision Committee of Jarugumalli Mandal of Ongole Registration District, and to pass orders within two (2) weeks from the date of order. The petitioner’s contention is that the respondent has not implemented the said order. However, the main writ petition itself is closed on 01.12.2022.
In the circumstances, nothing further survives in this contempt case and it is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date: 07.03.2026 KA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 235/2018 Date: 07.03.2026 KA