Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/856/2018 of K. Satyanarayana, Vs M.Nagabhushana Rao, on 6 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 856/2018 Between: 1. K. SATYANARAYANA,, C/O SATYA KUMAR, RIO 9-1-63/2, NEW RESUVANI
APHC010237402018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 856/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K. SATYANARAYANA,, C/O SATYA KUMAR, RIO 9-1-63/2, NEW RESUVANI PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.
2. T. VENKAT RAO,, R/O.GADDALA KUNTA, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. M NAGABHUSHANA RAO, Occ Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam (Urban), Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 07-02-2017 in W.P.No.4509 of 2017 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
This contempt case has been filed alleging disobedience of interim order of erstwhile High Court at Hyderabad, dated 07.02.2017 in W.P.No.4509 of 2017. The main writ petition came to be dismissed on 26.09.2018.
In the circumstances, nothing further survives in the contempt case and accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date: 07.03.2026 KA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 856/2018 Date: 07.03.2026 KA