Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31190/2023 of Pothuraju Sunanda Devi, Vs The Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Corporation Limited, on 6 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 31190/2023 Between: 1. POTHURAJU SUNANDA DEVI,, W/O. LATE SRI PRAUL JOSH AGE 52
APHC010605322023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31190/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. POTHURAJU SUNANDA DEVI,, W/O. LATE SRI PRAUL JOSH AGE 52 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 103, VENNA SAI PROJECTS SELENA COURT, KOMPALLI, HYDERABAD
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, ITI ROAD, VIJAYAWADA REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
2. THEN SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, OPERATIONS APCPDCL, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATIONS APCPDCL, NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT
4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APCPDCL NUZVID, ELURU DISTRICT
5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, APCPDCL NUZVID RURAL, ELURU DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
NJS,J W.P No.31190 of 2023
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL)
2. V V SATISH
NJS,J W.P No.31190 of 2023
The Court made the following Order:
Mr. Ch. Prabhu Kumar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, granted on the earlier occasion shall stand vacated. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:07.03.2026 Ksj