Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2396/2025 of J.V.V. SATYANARAYANA Vs J SHYAMALA RAO, IAS on 6 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3503] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2396/2025 Between: 1. J.V.V.

APHC010453002025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2396/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. J.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. NERELLAMMAGUDI VEEDI, 4-440, DURGDA VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL PITHAPURAM POST, KAKINADA DISTRICT., AP

...PETITIONER AND

1. J SHYAMALA RAO IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM(TTD) TIRUMALA, CHITTOR DISTRICT, AP

2. V VEERA BRAHAMAM I A S, PRESENTLY WORKING AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(L/C) S.V. BHAKTI CHANNEL (SVBC), TIRUPATI, CHITTOR DISTRICT, AP

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of order of this Honble Court Dt.31-07-2024 passed in W.A.No.306of 2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. YASWANTH GADE

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. . The Court made the following:

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)

Mr. A. Lalith, the learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the contempt case does not survive any further.

2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. [ As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J

_________________________ KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J 07.03.2026 PNS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead