CRP/121/2026 of POKALA PADMAVATHAMMA Vs MALISETTI SAROJAMMA on 5 March 2026

1. POKALA PADMAVA YEARS, OCC:CU GURRAMKONDA T

2. POKALA CHANDR YEARS, OCC:BUS BALIJAGADDA, G DISTRICT.

3. POKALA REDDI R OCC: HOUSEW GURRAMKONDA T

4. . POKALA REV AGED ABOUT 35 BALIJAGADDA, G DISTRICT.

1. MALISETTI SARO YEARS, R/OBAL ANNAMAYYA DIST

2. MALISETTI SREEN YEARS, R/O.BAL ANNAMAYYA DIST

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYAS EVISION PETITION No: 121 of 2026 ATHAMMA, W/o.REDDEPPA, AGE LTIVATION, R/o.D.No.6-35-2, B TOWN MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DIST RA SEKHAR, S/o.REDDEPPA, AGE SINESS & CULTIVATION, R/O GURRAMKONDA TOWN MANDAL, RANI, D/o.REDDEPPA, AGED ABOU WIFE,

R/O.D.NO.6-35-2, B TOWN MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DIST VATHI, D/O.REDDEPPA,

W/O.S 5 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE, R/ GURRAMKONDA TOWN MANDAL, ...P AND OJAMMA, W/O.SESHAIAH, AGED IJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOW TRICT. NIVASULU, S/O.SESHAIAH, AGE LIJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOW TRICT. DESH

SURYA ED ABOUT 62 BALIJAGADDA, TRICT. ED ABOUT 33 O.D.NO.6-35-2, ANNAMAYYA UT 41 YEARS, BALIJAGADDA, TRICT. SRINIVASULU, /OD.NO.6-35-2, ANNAMAYYA PETITIONER(S) D ABOUT 80 WN MANDAL, ED ABOUT 58 WN MANDAL,

3. MALISETTI RAVI KUMAR, S/O.SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.BALIJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOWN

MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

4. MALISETTI GOVINDU, S/O.SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.BALIJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOWN MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

5. MALISETTI LAKSHMI, W/O.GOVINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.BALIJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOWN

MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

6. NAKKA GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O.SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.BALIJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOWN MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

7. KANDULA GUNASEKHAR, S/O.RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O.BALIJAGADDA, GURRAMKONDA TOWN

MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. Mr.B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): -None-

The Court made the following order:

The present Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by non-disposal of I.A.No.353 of 2025 in O.S.No.149 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vayalpad.

The case of the Revision Petitioners is that I.A.No.353 of 2025 filed for grant of temporary injunction is not being disposed of and the same is being adjourned from time to time.

The learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia submits that when an application is filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C., the same shall be disposed of, within a period of 30 days and due to non-disposal of the I.A., the petitioners / plaintiffs are put to irreparable loss and prejudice. The counsel also submits that I.As., are posted to 17.04.2026.

In view of the same, instead of going into merits of the case directing notice, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the Revision Petition, providing that the learned Trial Court shall dispose of the said I.A., as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four weeks from the date of next posting, in accordance with the Law.

Accordingly, the Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

Dt. 06.03.2026 BLV

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 121 of 2026 Date: 06.03.2026 BLV