Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/12/2026 of E. RAGHAVENDRA KUMAR Vs MANAZIR JEELANI SAMOON, IAS on 5 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 12/2026 Between: 1. E. RAGHAVENDRA KUMAR, S/O. MALLIKARJUNA SETTY, AGE 40

APHC010691782025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 12/2026

Between:

1. E. RAGHAVENDRA KUMAR, S/O. MALLIKARJUNA SETTY, AGE 40

YEARS, OCC JUNIOR ASSISTANT, O/O. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

OF AGRICULTURE (R), NANDYAL DIVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. MANAZIR JEELANI SAMOON IAS, I.A.S., Commissioner Director, Agriculture Cooperation Department, Old Mirchi Yard, Nallapadu Road, Chuttagunta, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh-522004.

...CONTEMNOR

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondent U/Secs.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful disobedience towards the interim order dt. 17-07-2023 passed in WP No.17412 of 2023 by this Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PEETA RAMAN

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present contempt case is filed for willful disobedience of the interim order dated 17.07.2023, passed by this Court in W.P.No.17412 of 2023, wherein this Court directed to consider the memo issued by the 1st respondent to take appropriate action.

2. After notice, the respondents have filed their counter. Along with the counter, the respondents have also filed the speaking orders passed on 12.08.2023. In view of the same, this court is of the opinion that there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested to give liberty to assail the said speaking orders in the court of law.

4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to assail the speaking order dated 12.08.2023, passed by the respondents in appropriate court of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________ D. RAMESH,J Date:06.03.2026 Gk.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE No.12 OF 2026

Date:06.03.2026 Gk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead