Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2833/2012 of THOLETI GANGULAMMA Vs BAYAMUTHAKA NARAYNAPPA & 2 OTHERS on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2833/2012 Between: 1. THOLETI GANGULAMMA, W/O T.KULLAYI REDDY, OCC:
APHC010459482012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2833/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THOLETI GANGULAMMA, W/O T.KULLAYI REDDY, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI, H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. BAYAMUTHAKA NARAYNAPPA 2 OTHERS, S/O CHENNAPPA, R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST.
2. BAYAMUTHAKA NAGAMMA, W/O NARAYANAPPA, R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST. R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST. R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST.
3. BAYAMUTHAKA NARAYANAMMA, W/O NARAYANAPPA, R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST. R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST. R/O APPAIAHGARIPALLI PEMMANAKUNTLAPALLI THANDA (POST), H/O NALLAMADA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following ORDER :
It is represented by Sri S.Noor Mohammed, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 06.03.2026. Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2833/2012 Dt: 06.03.2026 Dvs