Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/174/2026 of K. DURGAMBIKA Vs Sri G. SIMHA CHALAM on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 174/2026 Between: 1. K. DURGAMBIKA, W/O. EAMANI SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45
APHC010714862025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. K. DURGAMBIKA, W/O. EAMANI SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT
45 YEARS, C/O. INDIRA PRIYADARSHINI LADIES HOSTEL, ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI G SIMHA CHALAM, REGISTRAR, ACHARYA NAGARJUNA
UNIVERSITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P.NO. 10558 OF 2018, dated 08-11-2025 passed, by Hon'ble Justice DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. YANAGUNURU SHASHANK
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. M.CHALAPATHI SC For Nagarjuna University
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.Chalapathi, learned counsel for respondent would submit that the order dated 08.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10559 of 2018 has been complied with vide Speaking order dated 24.02.2026.
2. Sri Yanagunuru Shashank, learned counsel for the petitioner is in attendance and would submit that recording the same the contempt may be closed.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________________________
DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.03.2026 UPS
Date: 06.03.2026 UPS