Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/45536/2018 of G. Madhavaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45536/2018 Between: 1. G. MADHAVAIAH, S/O. VENKAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010942892018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45536/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G. MADHAVAIAH, S/O. VENKAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
2. P. SINNAMA, W/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. I. RAJESH, S/O MAHESHWAR RAO AGED ABOUT
YEAR OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. M. SURESH, S/O GOPAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEAR OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
5. M. SRIDEVI, W/O. SRINIVASULLU AGED ABOUT 40 YEAR OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
6. G. NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O SINAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEAR OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) SECRETERIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the Respondents in trying to dispossess Writ Petitioners from their lands admeasuring
Ac.4,00cents, Ac.4.00cents, Ac.3.00cents in survey No's. 375-3, 376-1 ,377-2, 377-3, 377-4 and 375-2 respectively of Damavaram Village Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore, District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioners from their respective lands admeasuring
Ac.4.00cents, Ac.3.00cents in survey No's. 375-3, 376-1, 377-2, 377-3, 377-4 and 375-2 respectively of Damavaram Village, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore, District, without following due process of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioners from their respective lands admeasuring Ac.3.50cents, Ac.4.00cents, Ac.2.70cents, Ac.4.00cents, Ac.4.00cents, Ac.3.00cents in survey No's. 375-3, 376-1, 377-2, 377-3, 377-4 and 375-2 respectively of Damavaram Village, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore, District, without following due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER :
The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner have questioned the notice issued vide Rc.No.E1//859/2021 dated 31.07.2021 and the petitioner have questioned the same in W.P.No.29396 of 2021. In view of the same, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Dated: 06.03.2026 CMK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45536 of 2018
Dated : 06.03.2026 CMK