Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/45497/2018 of Sri Jhogi Sivakumar Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45497/2018 Between: 1. SRI JHOGI SIVAKUMAR, S/O. SUBBARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010941712018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45497/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI JHOGI SIVAKUMAR, S/O. SUBBARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.11-402-13, ASHOK NAGAR, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE-ASSIGNMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE.
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, GUDUR DIVISION, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDUR MANDAL, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondent 2 to 4 in not considering petitioners request for allotment of alternative land in Sy.No.85/A1B for mistakenly laying approach road on his patta land situated in Sy.No.85/A1A even though the joint inspection report confirmed the same, vide Lr. No. 916/ATO/R&B Approach Road/2017 dt. 14.05.2018, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 300 A of Constitution of India by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of MANDAMUS and direct the respondents 2 to 4 to immediately consider the request of the petitioner for allotment of land in Sy.No. 85/A1B of West Gudur Village, Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioner dt. 4.11.2018 for allotment order in respect of land in Sy.No.85/A1B of West Gudur Village, Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVAS KARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER :
No representation for the petitioner.
During the course of hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the District Revenue Officer, Gudur Mandal, has conducted a detailed enquiry and rejected the case of the petitioner vide orders in Rc.No.E3/3895/2019, dated 10.09.2020.
In view of the same, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Dated: 06.03.2026 CMK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45497 of 2018
Dated : 06.03.2026 CMK