Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/674/2024 of Chikkudu Rajesh Vs Chikkudu @ Peetia UmaMaheswari, on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 674/2024 Between: 1. CHIKKUDU RAJESH, , S/O. PEDDA VENKATESWARLU AGED
APHC010322182024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 674/2024
Between:
1. CHIKKUDU RAJESH, , S/O. PEDDA VENKATESWARLU AGED
ABOUT 35 YEARS, POLICE CONSTABLE WITH NO. 3615, PAMURU
POLICE STATION, PAMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. CHIKKUDU PEETIA UMAMAHESWARI, W/O. CHIKKUDU RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. PLOT NO. 41, POLICE
COLONY, PERNAMITTA, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. CHIKKUDU PURNA CHAITANYA, S/O. CHIKKUDU RAJESH, AGED
ABOUT 7 YEARS. MOTHER PROTECTION, R/O. PLOT NO. 41, POLICE COLONY, PERNAMITTA, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
3. CHIKKUDU SATHWIK, S/O. CHIKKUDU RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 5
YEARS. MOTHER PROTECTION, R/O. PLOT NO. 41, POLICE
COLONY, PERNAMITTA, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
(2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS BEING MINOR REP. BY THEIR
MOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN I.E., 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN)
4. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision
Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision case by setting aside the judgment dated 19.04.2024 passed in Crl.M.P. No. 91/2022 IN
Crl.M.P. No. 59/2018 IN M.C. No. 3 of 2018 on the file of the Judge Family Court - Cum - VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the certified copy of Order in Crl.M.P. No.
91/2022 IN Crl.M.P. No. 59/2018 IN M.C. No. 3 of 2018 on the file of the Judge Family Court - Cum - VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the order dated 19.04.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.
No. 91/2022 IN Crl.M.P. No. 59/2018 IN M.C. No. 3 of 2018 on the file of the Judge Family Court - Cum - VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESWARLU GADA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. CHALLA SIVASANKAR
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 674/2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
The present Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the judgment dated 19.04.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.91 of 2022 in Crl.M.P.No.59 of 2018 in M.C.No.3 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court - Cum - VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole.
2. None represented for the petitioner. Sri Challa Sivasankar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State are in attendance.
3. As can be seen from the record, this Court is of the view that the present revision is not maintainable against the order of the learned Trial Judge issuing an arrest warrant against the petitioner for non-payment of maintenance to the wife and children in a petition filed for enforcement of the maintenance granted in favour of respondent Nos.1 to 3.
5. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.03.2026. UPS
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 674/2024
Dt.06.03.2026
UPS