Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2980/2026 of PARUCHURI SUJATHA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 2980/2026 Between: 1. PARUCHURI SUJATHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, CURRENTLY WORKING
APHC010044532026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 2980/2026
Between:
1. PARUCHURI SUJATHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, CURRENTLY
WORKING AS AN ANGANWADI WORKER (AAYA) AT THE 25TH
ANGANWADI CENTER, ALLAGADDA URBAN, ALLAGADDA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, AND RESIDING ATH.NO. 9-7-12, L.M.
COMPOUND, ALLAGADDA TOWN, NANDYALA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN
AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE, GOVERNMENT
OF ANDHRA PRADESH, JAMPANI TOWERS, GUNTUR, ANDHRA
PRADESH-522002.
3. THE DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE OF ANGANWADI WORKERS
NANDYALA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYALA DISTRICT-518502.
4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, CDS PROJECT, ALLAGADDA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT-518502.
5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT,
KOTABOMMALI
MANDAL,
NANDYALA
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH-518502.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari fied Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, declaring the oral removal from service, deletion of biometric attendance, and the Termination of the petitioner by the 5 respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice, and consequently set aside the said oral termination, and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Anganwadi Worker (Aaya) at the 25th Anganwadi Centre, Allagadda Urban, with full back wages, continuity of service, and ail attendant and consequential benefits, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to forthwith restore the petitioner’s biometric attendance and permit her to discharge her duties as Anganwadi Worker, pending disposal of the writ petition, with all service and monetary benefits, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH.U.M.REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition was filed on the ground that without passing any orders, the services of the petitioner have been terminated orally. Considering the said submissions, this Court directed the respondents to get instructions. Based on the same, the respondents have placed the order passed by the 5th respondent on 10.12.2025 wherein the respondents have conducted an enquiry and based on the enquiry, the District Selection Committee has examined the issue and passed the orders terminating the services of the petitioner vide orders dated 10.12.2025. The same was served on the learned counsel for the petitioner also.
2. On perusal of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dismiss the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to assail the same in a separate proceedings.
3. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 10.12.2025 in a separate proceedings. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________ D. RAMESH,J Date:06.03.2026 Gk.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.2980 OF 2026
Date:06.03.2026 Gk