Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14462/2014 of AMABATI MARY VIVEKANADA DEVI, E.G. DIST. Vs PRL. SECY., M.A. DEPT. & 4 ORS. on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 14462/2014 Between: 1. AMABATI MARY VIVEKANADA DEVI, E.G. DIST., W/O. A . VENKATA
APHC010125842014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14462/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. AMABATI MARY VIVEKANADA DEVI, E.G. DIST., W/O. A. VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, WARD NO.21, BHUPAYYA AGRAHARAM, VINAYAKA STREET, AMALAPURAM, E.G.DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. PRL SECY M A DEPT 4 ORS, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, AMALAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APEPDCL, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APEPDCL, AMALAPURAM TOWN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE ADDL ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATIONS APEPDCL, AMALAPURAM TOWN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
NJS,J W.P No:14462 of 2014
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B VISWESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY
2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, Standing Counsel For Municipalities
3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
4. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
5. M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL)
6. P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL)
NJS,J W.P No:14462 of 2014
The Court made the following Order:
On the earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for Dismissal”.
2. Though the matter is listed under the caption “for Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even today also.
3. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:06.03.2026 Ksj