Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/975/2025 of Vandanapu Veera Venkata Subrahmanya, Vs Kasani Venkanna Babu, on 5 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 975/2025 Between: 1. VANDANAPU VEERA VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA,, S/O. APPALA RAJU,
APHC010169382025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 975/2025
Between:
1. VANDANAPU VEERA VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA,, S/O. APPALA
RAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.18-51/15, RNG COMPLEX, OPPOSITE SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY
TEMPLE, TANUKU.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KASANI VENKANNA BABU, S/o. Chandra Rao, aged about 57
years. Resident of Relangi Village, Irgavaram Mandal, Tanuku
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow this Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.16 of 2023 on the file of the Before The Civil Judge (Senior Division) Tanuku dt.17.02.2025
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Final Decree Petition i.e. F.D.I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.16 of 2023 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division): Tanuku. pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition in the interest of Justice
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. YASWANTH GADE
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri J.Suhas Kiran, learned counsel representing Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner reported that the present Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 06th March, 2026
RKS