Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/3486/2025 of VEMPALLE SARADA Vs MARPURI VENKATA SWAMY on 5 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION N Between: 1. VEMPALLE SARADA, D/ R/o. CHIPPILI, MADANAPALLE MANDAL. 2. VEMPALLE SADASIVA REDDY, S/ 37 YEARS, R/O. CHIPPILI,

APHC010614012025

IN TH

FRIDA

TWO

THE HONOURA

CIVIL RE

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. VEMPALLE SARA R/o. CHIPPILI, MAD

2. VEMPALLE SADAS 37 YEARS, R/O. CH

1. MARPURI VENKA

2. M R NAIDU, S R/o.D.No.1-478, A 2ND PETITIONER THE LEGAL HEIR

3. MARPURI VENU DEFENDANT), A MADANAPALLE.

4. MARPURI AB S/o.RAMAIAH (2ND MARPURI ROAD,

5. RATAKONDA R DEFENDANT) A MADANAPALLE.

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYAS EVISION PETITION No: 3486 of 2025 ADA, D/o. GANGI REDDY, AGED DANAPALLE MANDAL. SIVA REDDY, S/o. GANGI REDDY, HIPPILI, MADANAPALLE MANDAL. ...P AND ATA SWAMY, (DIED) (PLAINTIFF) S/o.M. VENKATASWAMY, AGED AMINENI STREET, MADANAPALLE. IN I.A. NO. 657 OF 2005 DATED OF THE DECEASED 1 ST RESPON GOPAL NAIDU DIED, S/O.KRISH AGED

YEARS, R/o. AMIN BBAYYAGARI KRISHNAMURTH D DEFENDANT) AGED 65 YEARS, R MADANAPALLE. RAJANNADIED, S/o. VENKATRA AGED 50 YEARS, R/o. NEERUGAT DESH

SURYA

D 37 YEARS, AGED ABOUT PETITIONER(S) 73 YEARS, (ADDED AS 12.12.2006 AS NDENT) HNAPPA, (1ST NENI ROAD, Y, (DIED), R/o.D.No.2-241, AMANA (3RD TTIVARIPALLE,

6. MARPURI BHASKAR NAIDU (DIED), S/o. RAMANAPPA (4TH DEFENDANT),

AGED

YEARS, R/o. AMINENI ROAD, MADANAPALLE.

7.

8. GHOUSE PASHA(5TH DEFENDANT),

AGED

YEARS, HYDERABAD. NAGIREDDYGARI VENKATRAMANA REDDY (DIED) (6TH DEFENDANT)

9. SAADAM SUBBANNADIED, S/O.NARAPPA (7TH DEFENDANT) AGED 72 YEARS, R/O. CHIPPILI, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

10. SADAM RAMANNA DIED, S/O. NARAPPA (8TH DEFENDANT), AGED 66 YEARS, CHIPPILI, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

11. MARPURINARASIMHULU, MARPURINARASIMHULU (DIED) (9TH DEFENDANT)

12. MARPURI KRISHNAMURTHY, (DIED), S/O. LATCHANNA, (10TH DEFENDANT), AGED 75 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-413-D, SOCIETY COLONY, MADANAPALLE.

13. D.SREENIVASULU NAIDU, (DIED), S/o. NARAPPA (11TH DEFENDANT), AGED 83 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1/532, AMINENI STREET, B.K PALLE, MADANAPALLE.

14. DOMMALAPATI VENKATRAMANA, (DIED) (12TH DEFENDANT)

15. BUKYA SREERAMULU, (13TH DEFENDANT) AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. NAKKALADINNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE.

16. BANAVATH THAVRE NAIK, , S/O.GUNA NAIK (14TH DEFENDANT) AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. NAKKALADINNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE.

17. DOMMALAPATI VISWANATHA NAIDU, S/O. RANGASWAMY NAIDU (15TH DEFENDANT) AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. COUSINS ROAD, MADANAPALLE.

18. R VENUGOPAL SASTRY, (DIED), S/O. KRISHNA SASTRI (16TH DEFENDANT) AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. APPARAO STREET, MADANAPALLE.

19. DEGALA VENKATRAMANA, (DIED) (17TH DEFENDANT)

20. MALEPATI ALIVELAMMA, W/O. VENKATRAMANA, (18TH DEFENDANT)

AGED

YEARS, R/O. CHIPPILI, MADANAPALLE.

21. MALEPATI RAMALAKSHMAMMA, W/O.CHANDRAPPA (19TH DEFENDANT) AGED 41 YEARS, R/O. CHIPPILI, MADANAPALLE.

22. PASUPULETI PAPANNA, (DIED), S/O.CHENMAPPA (20TH DEFENDANT) AGED 70 YEARS, R/O. CHIPPILI, MADANAPALLE.

23. YERRAGUDU REDDENNA, (DIED) (21ST DEFENDANT)

24. POREDDI LEELAVATHI, W/O. BHASKAR REDDY, (24TH DEFENDANT) AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. KATLATAPALLE VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE.

25. BUKYA VENKATA NAIK, S/O. RAMLA NAIK (25TH DEFENDANT) AGED 75 YEARS, R/O. NAKKALADINNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

26. BUKYA CHANDRA NAIK, S/O.GOPAL NAIK (26TH DEFENDANT) AGED 36 YEARS, R/O. NAKKALADINNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

27. BUKYA MUNE NAIK, (DIED) (27TH DEFENDANT)

28. BUKYA GOPAL NAIK, (DIED) (28TH DEFENDANT)

29. BUKYA SEENA NAIK, S/O. KAMLA NAIK (29TH DEFENDANT) AGED

YEARS, R/O. R/O. NAKKALADINNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

30. DEGALA CHENGAL RAYAPPA, (DIED), S/O. RAMAIAH (30TH DEFENDANT) AGED 56 YEARS, R/O. PAPPIREDDIGARIPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

31. DEGALA KRISHNAMMA, W/O.SUBBANNA (31ST DEFENDANT) AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. PAPPIREDDIGARIPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, MADANAPALLE MANDAL.

32. NAGIREDDIGARI RAMANATHA REDDY DIED, S/O. LATE. VENKATRAMANA REDDY (32ND DEFENDANT), AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. PONNUTIPALEM VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE.

33. NAGIREDDIGARI JAGANNATHA REDDY, S/o. LATE. VENKATRAMANA REDDY (33RD DEFENDANT), AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. PONNUTIPALEM VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE.

34. NAGIREDDIGARI VISWANATHA REDDY, S/O. LATE. VENKATRAMANA REDDY (34TH DEFENDANT AGED 48YEARS, R/O. PONNUTIPALEM VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE.

35. MARPURI SUBBA REDDY DIED, S/O. LATE NARASIMHULU (35TH DEFENDANT) AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. AMINENI STREET MADANAPALLE.

36. YERRAGUDU GANGI REDDY, S/O. LATE REDDENNA (36TH DEFENDANT) AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. CHIPPILI, PONNUTIPALEM VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE.

37. D RAMACHANDRA NAIDU, S/O. LATE. VENKATRAMANA AGED 68 YEARS, R/O. KGF.

38. D KRISHNAMURTHY NAIDU, S/O. LATE VENKATRAMANA, AGED

YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-20-11-1, KRISHNA NAGAR, MADANAPALLE.

39. D RANGASWAMY NAIDU, S/O. LATE VENKATRAMANA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-20-11-1, KRISHNA NAGAR, MADANAPALLE.

40. BUKYA HEMALUMMA, W/O. LATE MUNE NAIK, AGED 84 YEARS.

41. BUKYA LAKSHMAN NAIK, W/O. LATE MUNE NAIK, AGED 64 YEARS.

42. BUKYA BADDA NAIK, W/O. LATE MUNE NAIK, AGED 60 YEARS,

43. KORRA MUNEMMA, W/O. LAKSHMAN NAIK, AGED 69 YEARS, DANDLAPALLE THANDA, KOTHAPALLE, KANDUKURU VILLAGE, PTM MANDAL.

44. CHALARAMMA, W/O. CHAKRE NAIK, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. THUMMALA THANDA,

ANIKISETTIPALLE VILLAGE,

45. MANGAMMA, W/O. LAKSHMAN NAIK, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. THUMMALA THANDA,

ANIKISETTIPALLE VILLAGE,

46. CHANDRAMMA, W/O.SREERAMULU NAIK, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O.SRINIVASAPURAM THANDA, KADIRI TOWN, ANANTAPUR. (THE RESPONDENTS 40 TO 46 ARE THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED 27TH DEFENDANT. ADDED AS PER ORDERS IN I.A. NO. 1283 OF 1997 DATED 04.12.2000)

47. BUKYASIDDAMMA, W/O. LATE GOPAL NAIK, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O. NAKKALIDANNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE.

48. BUKYA REDDEPPA NAIK, S/O. GOPAL NAIK, AGED 45 YEARS, WORKING IN TTD ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, TIRUPATHI.

49. REDDEMMA, W/O. NARAYANA NAIK, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. DANDLAPALLE THANDA, KOTHAPALLE, KANDUKURU VILLAGE, PTM MANDAL.

50. CHINNA REDDEMMA, D/O. LATE GOPAL NAIK, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. NAKKALADINNE THANDA, MADANAPALLE.

51. BUJJAMMA, W/O. RAMANA NAIK, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. REDDIVAREPALLE, THANKAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR. (THE RESPONDENTS 47 TO 52 ARE THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED 28TH DEFENDANT. ADDED AS PER ORDERS IN I.A. NO. 1283 OF 1997 DATED 04.12.2000)

52. D JAYAMMA, W/O. VENKATRAMANA, AGED 45 YEARS.

53. D RAMAMURTHY, S/O. LATE. D. RAMAIAH, AGED YEARS, ( RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO 53 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THE PRESENT CRP) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Mr.N PRAMOD Counsel for the Respondent(S): Mr.Jitendra.K.

The Court made the following order:

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by non-disposal of I.A.No.185 of 2019 in I.A.No.1283 of 1997 in O.S.No.143 of 1991 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.

2. The suit is filed for partition of the plaint schedule properties. During the pendency of the suit, it appears that some miscellaneous applications were filed including I.A.No.1283 of 1997 and the same is sought to be disposed of by the learned Senior Civil Judge. The petitioners / defendants in the suit filed I.A.No.185 of 2019 seeking to receive the objections. However, without considering the said I.A., the learned Civil Judge is proceeding with the matter and therefore, the present Revision Petition is filed.

3. At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that as the suit is of the year 1991, instead of examining the merits of the matter, the Court may consider disposal of the Revision Petition with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the main suit along with the miscellaneous applications, as expeditiously as possible. The learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly agreed for disposal of the Civil Revision Petition on the said lines.

4. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, providing that the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle shall make endeavour to dispose of the main suit along with all the miscellaneous applications, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with Law. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

Dt. 06.03.2026 BLV

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 3486 of 2025 Date: 06.03.2026 BLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead