WP/4777/2026 of M. Jagadeesh Raju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 March 2026

1. M. JAGADEESH RAJU, , S/O M. RAVI PRASAD RAJU, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO. 26-127-2-1, KONETIPALEM VILLAGE, PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, MADANAPALLI DISTRICT.

2. M. RAVI PRASAD RAJU,, S/O M. MUDDUKRISHNAMA RAJU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O D.NO. 26-127-2-1, KONETIPALEMVILLAGE, PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, MADANAPALLI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522238.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, MADANAPALLI DISTRICT. - 517325.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, MADANAPALLI DISTRICT.- 517325

4. THE TAHSILDAR, KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, MADANAPALLI DISTRICT. - 517350.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not implementing the Award dated 08.02.2020 passed by the National Lok Adalat in W.P. No. 2801 of 2019 and the order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 11691 of 2021 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to mutate the names of the petitioners in the revenue records and issue Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds in respect of land admeasuring Ac.3.81 cents in Sy.No.220 of Angallu Village, Kurabalakota Mandal and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioners' representation dated 07.01.2026 within a time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. PASAPALA SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

WRIT PETITION NO.4777 of 2026 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition, with a liberty to the petitioners to pursue their remedies before the appropriate forum.

2. Considering the request, permission is granted.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioners to ventilate appropriate legal remedies available before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if so advised.

4. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date:05.03.2026 SA/SCS

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

WRIT PETITION NO: 4777/2026 Date: 05.03.2026

SA/SCS