Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/239/2026 of Kothuru Srinivasulu Achari Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. KOTHURU SRINIVASULU ACHARI, S/O. K.JAGAN MOHAN ACHARI,AGE 40 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010111672026
IN THE H
(
THURSDA
TWO T
THE HONOURABLE DR
CRIMINAL
Between:
1. KOTHURU
SRINIVA
ACHARI,AGE 40 Y
RAILWAY KODURUA
1. THE STATE OF A
PROSECUTOR,HIGH
AMARAVATI.
2. SHRIRAM FINANCE
PHASE, INDUSTRIA
OFFICE AT RAILWAY
ITS
AUTHORISE
M.GANGADHARA.
Revision filed under
circumstances
stated
in
CriminalRevisionCase, the
aside the order dt. 12-12-20
1050 of 2025 on the file
Principal Assistant sessio
pending disposal of main C
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR
L REVISION CASE NO: 239/2026
ASULU
ACHARI,
S/O.
K.JAGAN
YEARS, R/O. D.NO.10/451,LAKSHMI
ANNAMARIA DISTRICT.
...PE
AND
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
H
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRAD
LTD, SRI TOWERS, PLOT NO.14
AL ESTATE,GUINDY, CHENNAI AND
Y KODURU BRANCH,KADAPA DISTRIC
ED
OFFICER/POWER
OFAT
...RESPON
Section 397/401 of CrPC praying t
n
the
affidavit
filed
in
support
High Court may be pleased to pleas
025 passed in CrI.M.P No. 466 of 2025 i
of the court of Chief Judicial Magistra
ons Judge, Kadapa, in the interest of
Criminal Revision petition and pass
RATAPA
MOHAN
NAGAR,
TITIONER
S PUBLIC
ESH
AT
4A,SOUTH
DBRANCH
CTREP.BY
TTORNEY,
NDENT(S):
that in the
t
of
the
sed to Set
n CFR No.
ate - cum -
Justice, in
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Suspend the docket order dt. 12-12- 2025 passed in CrI.M.P No.
466 of 2025 in CFR No. 1050 of 2025 on the file of the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate - Cum -Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kadapa, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CHEVURI RAMA SWAMY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 239/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed seeking to set aside the order dated 12.12.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No.466 of 2025 in CFR No.1050 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate–cum–Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kadapa.
2. Heard Sri Ch.Ramaswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order passed by the learned Magistrate is illegal and irregular. He would further submit that the petitioner obtained a loan of Rs.25,00,000/- from the 2nd respondent company by depositing title deeds of the property and agreed to repay the same in 60 equated monthly installments. He would further submit that the petitioner has already paid an amount of Rs.14,46,101/- towards the loan, but the 2nd respondent is claiming an excessive amount without properly giving credit to the payments made by the petitioner. He further submits that the 2nd respondent filed the petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act without approaching the competent forum and that the learned Magistrate passed the impugned order without giving any opportunity to the petitioner, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, would submit that the learned Magistrate passed the impugned order in accordance with law and that no interference is required. She prayed that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. As can be seen from the record, it appears that the warrant issued pursuant to the impugned order was executable by 22.01.2026. The present matter has come up before this Court on 05.03.2026. In view of the same, this Court does not find any grounds warranting interference with the impugned order.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.03.2026. KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 239/2026
Date 05.03.2026 KKV