Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/314/2011 of PYDI HARI PRIYA Vs PYDI SREENIVASA RAO on 4 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 Between: 1. PYDI HARI PRIYA, W/O SREENIVASA RAO C/O RAYAPUREDDI SIMHADRI RAO R.T.C. CONDUCTOR, R/O
APHC010230282011
IN TH
THURS
TWO
THE HONOUR
THE HONOUR
CIVIL MISC
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PYDI HARI PRIYA, W RAO R.T.C. CON N.K.RAJAPURAM,
1. PYDI SREENIVASA Amadalavalasa Mand
Appeal Under Section IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP Petition under Section affidavit filed in support of operation of the order date Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Sr Counsel for the Appella
1. K V SUBRAHMANY Counsel for the Respon
1. ARAVALA RAMA R The Court made the foll
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TIL RABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAM CELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/201 W/O SREENIVASA RAO C/O RAYAPURE NDUCTOR, R/O SEETHAMPETA AND RAO, S/o Venkata Rao R/o Gajulako dal, Srikakulam District. .. n_____against orders P 609 OF 2011 n 151 CPC praying that in the circumstan the petition, the High Court may be plea ed 22-2-2011 in MOP.NO. 88 of 2008 rikakulam ant: YA NARUSU ndent: RAO lowing: DESH
LHARI MALLI
EDDI SIMHADRI ROAD, NEAR ...APPELLANT llivalasa Village, ..RESPONDENT nces stated in the ased suspend the on the file of the
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
The appellant is the respondent in M.O.P.No.88 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam. The said M.O.P., was filed by the respondent/petitioner seeking a decree of divorce by dissolution of the marriage solemnized between the parties on 14.05.2003. The learned Court allowed the petition and granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage. Challenging the said order, the present CMA has been filed under section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the matter has been settled before the learned Trial Court.
4. On perusal of the record, it is seen that the Mediation Center has submitted a report dated 20.02.2026, indicating that the mediation was conducted on 25.07.2025. As per the mediator’s report, the matter had already been settled between the parties before the learned Trial Court. The compromise agreement dated 23.06.2012 has been filed along with the report.
5. Upon perusal of the agreement dated 23.06.2012 annexed to the mediator report, it is not evident whether the said compromise was entered into before the Court, acted upon pursuant to any Court order, or was an out of court settlement.
6. So, without observing if such settlement dated 23.06.2012 was in the learned Trial Court as mentioned in the report of the mediation, but as the appellant’s counsel is not present, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J
Dated: 05.03.2026 SAK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011
Dated: 05.03.2026 SAK