Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/228/2026 of Marni Ammiraju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. MARNI AMMIRAJU, S/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY,AGED 58 YEARS,CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF D.NO
APHC010099832026
IN THE H
(
THURSDA
TWO T
THE HONOURABLE DR
CRIMINAL
Between:
1. MARNI AMMIRAJU,
YEARS,CULTIVATION
VILLAGE,KAPILESWA
KONASEEMA DISTRI
1. THE STATE OF A
PROSECUTOR,HIGH
2. MARNI ADI LAKSHM
YEARS,
CULTIV
MANDAL,DR.B.R.AMB
VILLAGEMKAPILESW
Revision filed under
circumstances
stated
in
CriminalRevisionCase, the
Grant Stay of all the subseq
in the court of Civil judge (ju
Alamuru, pending final disp
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section
in the affidavit filed in supp
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR
L REVISION CASE NO: 228/2026
S/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY
N,
RESIDENT
OF
D.NO
2-17.
ARAPURAM
MANDAL,DR.
BR
AM
ICT.
...PE
AND
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE
H COURT OF AP AT AMARAVATHI.
MI, W/O. RAMAKRISHNA MURTHY,
VATION,
RESIDENT
OF
BEDKAR
KONASEEMA
17.
WARAPURAM DISTRICT.
...RESPON
Section 397/401 of CrPC praying t
n
the
affidavit
filed
in
support
High Court may be pleased tomay be
quent proceedings in M.C No: 1/ 2024 o
unior Division)-cum-judicial magistrate o osal of present Criminal Revision case 151 CPC praying that in the circumstan port of the petition, the High Court may
[3396]
RATAPA
,AGED 58
NALLURU
MBEDKAR
TITIONER
E PUBLIC
AGED 86
D.NO.2-
NALLURU
NDENT(S):
that in the
t
of
the
pleased to
on the file of
of first class
nces stated
be pleased
pleased to condone the delay of (320)days in filing the above CrI.R.C. filed against the CRL.M.P.No.408/2025, dated 08.01.2025 on the file of the IN
THE
COURT
OF
THE
XIII
ADDITIONAL
SESSIONS
JUDGE
RAMACHANDRAPURAM otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and hardship and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Grant Stay of all the subsequent proceedings in M.C No: 1/ 2024
on the file of in the court of Civil judge (junior Division)- cum-judicial magistrate of first class Alamuru, pending final disposal of present Criminal Revision case and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ANGADA SATYA RAGHAVENDRA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
I.A.No.01 of 2026
In/And
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 228/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
The petitioner herein is the son and the respondent No.2 is the mother of the petitioner. The present Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the order dated 08.01.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.408 of 2025 in Cr.R.P.No.46 of 2025 by the learned XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Ramachandrapuram, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, whereby the petition filed seeking stay of proceedings in M.C.No.01 of 2024 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Alamuru, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition, was dismissed.
2. By the impugned order dated 08.01.2025, the learned Judge, upon consideration of the material available on record, dismissed the stay petition.
3. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner preferred the present revision with a delay of 320 days. Along with the revision, the petitioner filed I.A. No.01 of 2026 seeking condonation of the said delay. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it is stated that due to non-receipt of a copy of the order, the petitioner could not contact his advocate within the stipulated time and therefore the delay occurred.
4. However, no material whatsoever has been placed before this Court to substantiate the said plea. The petitioner has failed to furnish any satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay of 320 days in filing the present revision. In the absence of sufficient cause, this Court is not inclined to condone the delay.
5. Be that as it may, on a perusal of the material available on record and the impugned order, it is evident that the learned Judge has considered the matter and passed the order in accordance with law. The quantum awarded cannot be said to be excessive or unreasonable warranting interference of this Court in exercise of its limited revisional jurisdiction. This Court does not find any illegality, irregularity or perversity in the impugned order.
6. Accordingly, I.A. No.01 of 2026 seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, the learned XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Ramachandrapuram, where Cr.R.P.No.46 of 2025 is pending, is directed to dispose of the said revision as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.03.2026 KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
I.A.No.01 of 2026 in/and Crl.R.C.No.228/2026 Dated 05.03.2026
KKV