Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3861/2024 of K. PANDURANGA RAO Vs E. YADAVA PATHI on 4 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No.3861 OF 2024 Between: 1. K.Panduranga Rao, S/o K.Krishnoji Rao, Aged about 65 years, K.Kothuru
APHC010435532024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.3861 OF 2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K.Panduranga Rao, S/o K.Krishnoji Rao, Aged about 65 years, K.Kothuru Village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District – 517424.
2. S.A.Khaleefulla, S/o late S.A.Lateef Saheb, Aged about 72 years, D.No.5-168, Bazaar Street, V.Kota, Chittoor District – 517424. ...Petitioners
AND
1. E.Yadava Pathi, S/o E.Raghunadhaiah, aged about 52 years, EO Yamaganipalle Village Gram Panchyat, Gudupalle Mandalam, Chittoor District.
2. K.Siva Sankar, S/o not known, Aged about 45 years, Panchayat Secretary/Executive Officer, V.Kota Gram Panchayat, V.Kota, Chittoor District – 517424. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors, for having violated and not implementing the order passed by this Honourable Court in W.P No.7253 of 2022 Dt.01.5.2024 by His Lordships the honorable Justice Sri N.Jaya Surya Garu deliberately and wilfully under the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass such other or further orders in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.S.S. Bhatt Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.Mattegunta Sudhir,
Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps, M.P.Ps,
Gram Panchayats
2 CC_3861_2024
The Court made the following ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Contempt Case does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J March 05, 2026 vasu