Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30478/2010 of Telagathoti Venkateshwarlu Vs The Asst. Engineer, on 4 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 30478/2010 Between: 1. TELAGATHOTI VENKATESHWARLU, S/O ANNAMAYYA COOLI R/O DOOR
APHC010081682010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30478/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TELAGATHOTI VENKATESHWARLU, S/O ANNAMAYYA COOLI R/O DOOR NO.5-98/1/14, BECKER COMPOUND BLONGS TO AEL CHURCH, BRODIPET, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ASST ENGINEER, Operation, APSPDCL Distribution, 1st Lane, Brodipet, Guntur.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
NJS,J W.P No.30478 of 2010
The Court made the following Order:
On 03.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for Dismissal”.
2. Though the matter is listed under the caption “for Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even today also.
3. Mr. Abdul Mateen, learned counsel, representing the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-DISCOM, states that as per the instructions dated 11.04.2025, it appears that nobody is available at the premises and the Service No.96654 was kept in bill stop on 29.03.2023. Be that as it may.
4. Under the said circumstances and as there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:05.03.2026 Ksj