Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/28227/2024 of MARADA VENKATESH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 2 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 28227/2024 Between: 1. MARADA VENKATESH, S/O SIVUNNAIDU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
APHC010540582024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 28227/2024
Between:
1. MARADA VENKATESH, S/O SIVUNNAIDU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC GR-II VILLAGE AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANT PONDURU-III
RYTHU SEVA KENDRAM, PONDURU MANDAL SIRKAKULAM
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 168
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH
- 522 238
2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRIRCULTURE, AGRICULTURE MARKET
COMMITTEE ROAD MURIKIPET, CHUTTUGUNTA CIRCLE RYTHU
BAZAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 004
3. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT
COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, SRIKAKULAM ANDHRA PRADESH - 532
4. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
VIZIANAGARAM
DISTRICT
COLLECTORATE, VIZIANAGARAM ANDHRA PRADESH - 535 003
5. THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER, NEW BRIDGE ROAD,
GUJARATHIPETA SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANDHRA
PRADESH - 532 005
6. THE
DISTRICT
AGRICULTURE
OFFICER,
COLLECTORATE
COMPLEX, VIZIANAGARAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH
7. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, RANASTALAM SUB- DIVSION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 407
8. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, O/O THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE
OFFICER NEW BRIDGE ROAD, GUJARATHIPETA SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH-532 005
9. 9 THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MANDAL
PRAJA PARISHAD, MAKKUVA VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P - 535
10. THE MANDAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, MAKKUVA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 535 547
11. 11 THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MANDAL
PRAJA PARISHAD, PONDURU SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P - 532
12. THE MANDAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 168
13. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, (PANCHAYAT SECRETARY) GRAM
PANCHAYAT, PONDURU PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 168
14. THE SUBTREASURY OFFICER, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 168
15. THE
KAVIRIPALLI
GRAM
PANCHAYAT,
MAKKUVA
MANDAL,
VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 535 547 REP.BY
ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY
16. POGIRI NEELIMA, RAITHU SEVA KENDARAM KONDAPURAM, PALAKONDA MANDAL PARVATHIPURAM, MANY AM DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 440 (PRESENTLY, AEO(GR-II), KOTHURU,
KOTHURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P - 532 455
17. M SAI DEEPTHI, RAITHU SEVA KENDARAM T. JONNAVALASA, AMADALAVALASA MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P -532 185
(PRESENTLY, AEO(GR-II), BUIJA BURJA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 532 44
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents especially the respondent in issuing impugned proceedings Rc.No.Estt(l), 342/2024, 21- 11- 2024, by deleting my name from list of eligible Village Agricultural Assistants (Gr.II) for promotion to the next post i.e., Agricultural Extension Officer (Gr.II), governmenttheviolation orders/instructions / guidelines G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10-06-1999, and in deviation to the Provisional Seniority List dated 12-04-2024, Final Provisional Seniority List dated 14-10-2024, and the recommendation of the 7th respondent, and promoting the respondents 16 and 17, who are juniors to me, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, and against the well settled principles of natural justice, and consequentially direct the respondents to include my name in the promotion list ahead of the respondents 16 and 17, by setting aside the impugned proceedings Rc.No.Estt(l), 342/2024, 21-11-2024, issued by the 5th respondent herein, by calling for the entire records culminating into issuance of the impugned proceedings Rc.No.Estt(l), 342/2024, 21-11-2024, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Stay all further proceedings by suspending the operation of impugned proceedings Rc.No.Estt(l), 342/2024, 21-11-2024, issued by the 5th respondent herein, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. LEO LAW ASSOCIATES LLP
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
2. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents especially the 5th respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings dated 21.11.2024, by deleting the name of the petitioner from the eligible Village Agricultural Assistants (Gr.II) for promotion to the next post i.e, Agricultural Extension Officer (Gr.II), in violation of the G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser-C) Department, dated 10.06.1999 and deviation to the provisional seniority lists dated 12.04.2024 and 14.10.2024 as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he petitioner was initially selected pursuant to the notification No.1 of 2019 dated 26.07.2019 and appointed as Village Agricultural Assistant (Grade-II) and as per the appointment, the petitioner has joined the 1st respondent department and was allocated to Kaviripalli Village Secretariat of Makkuva Mandal in Vizianagaram District and reported to duty on 02.10.2019. Subsequently, the petitioner received a call from the 5th respondent’s office for the post of Village Agricultural Assistant (Grade-II) in non-local category and he has opted to work in Srikakulam District and as such he submitted a letter dated 14.11.2019 to that effect to the 3rd respondent and consequently, he was relieved from his duties on 21.11.2019 by the 9th respondent to enable him to join at Ponduru III Secretariat of Srikakulam District. 10th respondent issued a duty certificate dated 01.01.2020 certifying that the petitioner worked during 02.10.2019 to 20.11.2019 in Makkuva Mandal. The 15th respondent also issued the petitioner a non-drawal certificate dated 20.05.2024, certifying that he was not paid the salary for the period 02.10.2019 to 20.11.2019. Accordingly, the petitioner has joined on 21.11.2019 at Srikakulam District. Though the petitioner is entitled for the salary for the post he discharged at Vizianagaram, the petitioner has drawn the salary for the post at Srikakulam District. For the minor lapses, the respondents have initiated the departmental proceedings and concluded by awarding the minor punishment of Censure vide orders dated February, 2025.
3. In view of the censure, the respondents have bypassed the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Agricultural Assistant Extension Officer (Grade-II). Aggrieved by the said action, the present writ petition is filed.
4. While the writ petition was pending, the petitioner has also preferred an appeal before 2nd respondent as against the orders of the 5th respondent and the 2nd respondent passed the orders dated 27.05.2025 allowing the appeal by setting aside the minor punishment of censure imposed against the petitioner. Considering the same, the 5th respondent has forwarded a letter to the 3rd respondent on 09.06.2025 as there are 24 existing vacancies of Agricultural
Extension Officers (Grade-II). In view of setting aside of punishment of censure imposed against the petitioner, the case of the petitioner can be considered by the 3rd respondent in the existing vacancies. The said proposals are pending before the 3rd respondent.
4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also on perusal of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent dated 20.05.2025 and also the communication/proposal sent by the 5th respondent to 3rd respondent dated 09.06.2025, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider the proposal sent by the 5th respondent on 09.06.2025 and pass appropriate orders by taking into consideration of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent dated 20.05.2025. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________ D. RAMESH,J Date:03.03.2026 Gk.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.28227 OF 2024
Date:03.03.2026 Gk