Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1078/2014 of M/s.Dhanekula Venkata Subbaiah Charitable Trust Vs Southern Power Distribution company of AP Ltd on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 1078/2014 Between: 1. M/S.DHANEKULA VENKATA SUBBAIAH CHARITABLE TRUST, (VJA 668)
APHC010644592014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1078/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S.DHANEKULA VENKATA SUBBAIAH CHARITABLE TRUST, (VJA 668) KANURU, VIJAYAWADA(M) KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN D.RAVINDRANATH TAGORE, S/O.VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGE 74 YEARS
...PETITIONER AND
1. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD.,VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. SENIOR ACCOUNT OFFICER OPERATION, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION OF COMPANY OF AP LTD., VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the
NJS,J
W.P.NO.1078 OF 2014 High Court may be pleased toto issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents for not acting on petitioners representation dated 10.9.2013 and 11.12.2013 as arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and affect fundamental right of the petitioner Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constution of India and also direct the respondents to adjust 50% of the penal charges Rs.11,23,401/- paid by the petitioner in future consumption bills as per the directions of APERC in proceedings No./APERC/Secy/154/2013 dated 8.8.2013 and also direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps including disconnwection of power supply to the petitions unit and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 1228 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps including disconnect the power supply to the petitioner unit for adjusting the amount of 50% in Rs.11,23,401/- during R&C restrictions period pennal charges paid by the petitioner during R&C restrictions period in future consumption bills IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 42989 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V UPENDRA GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P VINOD KUMAR
2. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL)
NJS,J
W.P.NO.1078 OF 2014 The Court made the following ORDER:
As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 02.03.2026, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption <for orders=.
2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 03.03.2026
LSP