Andhra Pradesh High Court

LAAS/355/2013 of Special Deputy Collector (LA) & LAO Vs Lanka Koteswara Rao on 2 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.LAAS. No.355 of 2013 And 326 of 2018 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 03.03.2026 DEV,J & AHHS,J I.A.No.1, 2 and 3 of 2023 in LAAS. No.355 of 2013 One Lanka Koteswara Rao is the claimant in LA.O.P.No.19 of 2005 on the file of Senior

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AT AMARAVATI

MAIN CASE No.LAAS. No.355 of 2013 And 326 of 2018

PROCEEDING SHEET

Sl.

No

DATE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE

03.03.2026 DEV,J & AHHS,J

I.A.No.1, 2 and 3 of 2023 in LAAS. No.355 of 2013

One Lanka Koteswara Rao is the claimant in LA.O.P.No.19 of 2005 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid.

Questioning the order and decree passed therein, appeal in LAAS No.355 of 203 is filed by the Special Deputy Collector (LA) & Land Acquisition Officer, showing the claimant as the respondent.

Consequent to the death of the claimant, the legal representatives filed I.A.No.1 of 2023 for condonation of delay in filing the application to set aside the abatement; I.A.No.2 of 2023 to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole respondent and I.A.No.3 of 2023 to bring them on record as Legal heirs of the deceased- respondent/ original claimant.

Perused the averments made in the accompanying affidavit.

It is also relevant to note that the proposed party has also filed LAAS No.326 of 2018, which is under consideration along with the present LAAS No.355 of 2013.

2

There is no dispute about the status of Legal heirs of the proposed party.

Upon considering the facts and circumstances, and in view of the survival of cause of action etc., the prayer in the petitions found convincing and the delay is condoned.

Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 to 3 are allowed

Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments and add the proposed party – Lanka Sri Venkata Krishna Jala Jawahar, as the 2nd respondent in LAAS No.355 of 2013.

__________ DEV, J

__________ AHHS, J

LAAS. Nos.355 of 2013 & 326 of 2018

The Land Acquisition Appeal Suit No.355 of 2013 is dismissed.

The Land Acquisition Appeal Suit No.326 of 2018 is partly allowed.

[Vide Separate Common Judgment ]

___________ DEV, J

___________ AHHS, J Pnr

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead