Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24/2019 of P.Sanjeeva Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24/2019 Between: 1. P.SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O. P. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS,
APHC010000092019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 24/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. P.SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O. P. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, R/O. DEVANABANDA VILLAGE, PATTIKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P.
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADONI DIVISION, KURNOOL DISTRICT,
4. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, PATTIKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A. P.
5. SMT SANJAMMA, W/O. KADUBUR JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. TERNEKAL VILLAGE, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
6. SMT SARASWATHAMMA, W/O. KONDAPURAM NARAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.12/66/2, NEAR RETD. HEAD MASTER GOPAL REDDY HOUSE, SHANTI NAGAR, PATAN CHERUVU, HYDERABIID, MEDAK DISTRICT.
7. SMT SAROJAMMA, W/O. VISWANATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63
JS, J W.P.No.24/2019
YEARS, R/O. BANAVARAPU VILLAGE, ASPARI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in ,issuing the impugned notice in R.C.B.No.661/201 .12.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and malafide without power or authority contrary to the A.P.ROR Act, 1971 apart from violation of principles of natural justice by setting aside the same and consequentially direct the official respondents not to entertain any application filed by the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 to cancel the pattedar passbook and title deeds granted in my favor in respect of the lands in Sy. Nos. 472, 473/2 and 473/3 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned notice in R.C.B. 661/2018, dt. .12.2018 issued by the 4th Respondent pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. MURALI LINCOLN
JS, J W.P.No.24/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the unofficial respondents submit that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat.
In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 03.03.2026 SCH
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 24/2019
Date: 03.03.2026 SCH