Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/388/2026 of Dasi Jaya Babu Vs Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No. 388/2026 Between: 1. DASI JAYA BABU, S/O.LATE ABBULU AGE 50 YEARS, OCC WORKED
APHC010032752026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CONTEMPT CASE No. 388/2026
Between:
1. DASI JAYA BABU, S/O.LATE ABBULU AGE 50 YEARS, OCC
WORKED AS RECORD ASSISTANT IN AJCJ COURT, TUNI UNDER
DISMISSAL FROM SERVICE, NOW DOING COOLI WORKS D.NO.
1-152/1, MADHURA NAGAR, NEAR BENNI GARI CHURCH, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P- 533001
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, S.H.O. Thulluru P.S, Guntur District, AP
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of order Dt.22-07-2025 passed in CrI.P.No.1257 of 2024 on the file of this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PEDDI VIJAYBHASKAR
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 has been filed by the Petitioner to punish the Respondent/Contemnor for committing wilful violation of the Order passed by this Court dated 22.07.2025 in Crl.P. No.1257 of 2024.
At the time of hearing, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that after completion of investigation with regard to the subject crime, the Police filed charge sheet before the concerned Trial Court and no further orders are necessary in this matter.
Sri Peddi Vijay Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner acceded to the submissions of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and would submit that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet.
Considering the submissions made, this contempt case is closed. Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy of challenging the charge sheet according to law, if so advised.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 03.03.2026 Mjl/*
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CONTEMPT CASE No.388 of 2026
03.03.2026 Mjl/*