Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5044/2026 of ROMALA SRINIVASA RAO Vs ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT PETITION NO: 5044/2026 Between: 1. ROMALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SURI BABU, PROPRIETOR OF M/S SRI SRINIVASA STONE CRUSHER, R/O.D.NO. PAPAYYARAJUPALEM
APHC010089682026
IN TH
TUESD
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ROMALA SRINIVAS SRI SRINIVASA PAPAYYARAJUPAL VISAKHAPATNAM
1. ASSET RECOVER Authorized Office Visakhapatnam Tow Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue a Writ o nature Writ of Mandam Respondent Bank in con Sale Notice dated 0 unwarranted, unfair, unj Natural Justice contrary in violation of Article 30 the Respondent Bank n favour of the Auction Pu cents or 1.847hectors or E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 5044/2026 SA RAO, S/O SURI BABU, PROPRI A STONE CRUSHER, R LEM VILLAGE, SUJATHA TOWN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRIC AND RY BRANCH, Union Bank of India, er, O/o. D.No. 6-05-150, C wn and District- 530001. ...R le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High or Order or Direction more particularly mus by declaring the action, things nducting the e-auction on 28-01-2026 07-01-2026, which is illegal, irreg justified, unconstitutional, against to t to the provisions of SARFAESI Act an 00-A of Constitution of India and con not to issue Sale Certificate and regis urchaser in respect of property in an e r 22,215.6 Sq Yards in Sy.No.178/1 DESH
DRANATH ROY GEDELA IETOR OF M/S R/O.D.NO.-SO, A NAGAR, CT - 530051. ...PETITIONER Rep. by its Chingalraopeta, RESPONDENT aying that in the h Court may be y the one in the s and deeds of in pursuance of gular, arbitrary, the Principles of nd its Rules and sequently direct ster the same in extent of Ac.4.59 (Ac.1.87 cents),
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.5044 of 2026
178/3 (Ac.0.23 cents), 178/4 (Ac.0.07 cents), 178/5 (Ac.0.43 cents) and 178/6 (Ac. 1.99 cents) and an extent of Ac0.40 cents or 0.162 Hectors or 1936.00 Sq. Yards including ACC Sheets Shed and Stone Crusher Machinery overed in Sy.No. 178/7 (Ac0.21 cents) and 178/9 (Ac.0.19 Cents) of Vakapall Village, K.Kotapadu Sub Division, Devarapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District till the outcome in S.A.No.98/2025 pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam under the circumstances of the case and pass such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Bank not to issue Sale Certificate and register the Same in favour of the Auction Purchaser in respect of property in an extent of Ac.4.59 cents or 1.847 hectors or 22,215.6 Sq Yards in Sy.No.178/1 (Ac.1.87 cents), 178/3 (Ac.0.23 cents), 178/4 (Ac.0.07 cents), 178/5 (Ac.0.43 cents) and 178/6 (Ac. 1.99 cents) and an extent of Ac.0.40 cents or 0.162 Hectors or 1936.00 Sq. Yards including ACC Sheets Shed and Stone Crusher Machinery in Sy.No.178/7 (Ac.0.21 cents) and 178/9 (Ac.0.19 Cents) of Vakapall Village, K.Kotapadu Sub Division, Devarapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. RANGA SURYA PRAKASH RAO KOLA
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.5044 of 2026
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-Union Bank of India.
2. The only limited grievance of the writ petitioner is that the stay petition in interlocutory application No.703 of 2026 filed by him in securitization application No.98 of 2026, seeking not to register the sale certificate is not being disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam.
3. Therefore, having regard to the said limited grievance of the writ petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, to dispose of the interlocutory application No.703 of 2026, expeditiously, within a period of one week from date of receipt of this order, by way of passing appropriate orders on merits, according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 03.03.2026 MDP