Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1797/2019 of BOTLA RAMANAMMA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1797/2019 Between: 1. BOTLA RAMANAMMA, W/O.MALYADRI. AGED 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,
APHC010037822019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1797/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BOTLA RAMANAMMA, W/O.MALYADRI. AGED 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/OLIT-MASAMUDRAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE
3. JOINT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE
4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR REVENUE DIVISION. KANDUKUR TOWN. PRAKASAM DISTRICT
5. TAHSILDAR, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. UMMADISETTY RAMANAIAH, S/O,VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT
YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION. R/O.BALIJAPALEM.11/O.LINGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL. PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ. order or direction inure particularly one in the nature
JS, J W.P.No.1797/2019
of WRIT OF CERITIORARI calling for entire records connected to endorsement in Rc.D6/3898/2018 dated 27.10.2018 issued by the 3rd respondent proceedings in D.Dis/6026/16/13, dated 03.08.2015 issued by the 4th respondent and consequential Notice in RCA/05/2019, dated 25.01.2019 issued by the 5th respondent, examine the same and set aside such orders, after declaring the same, as illegal, irregular, irrational and un-constitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently. direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment over the above said house and site property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation or endorsement in Rc.D6/3898/2018, dated 27.10.2018 issued by the 3rd respondent, proceedings in D.Dis/6026/16/B, dated 03.08.2018 issued by the 4th respondent and consequential Notice in RCA/05/2019, dated 25.01.2019 issued by the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. A VARALAKSHMI
JS, J W.P.No.1797/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed O.S.No.178 of 2015 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kandukuru, Prakasam District and they will pursue their remedies before civil court.
3. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 03.03.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1797/2019
Date: 03.03.2026 rsd