Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3506/2013 of M/S. RAVI ELECTRICALS REWINDING WORKS,REP.BY PROP.,VSKPTM. Vs TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P.LTD.,REP.BY CE.,VSKPTM.,&ANR on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 3506/2013 Between: 1. M/S. RAVI ELECTRICALS REWINDING WORKS,REP.BY PROP.,VSKPTM., REP.
APHC010437752013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 3506/2013
Between:
1. M/S. RAVI ELECTRICALS REWINDING WORKS,REP.BY
PROP.,VSKPTM., REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI
V.V.BRAHMAJI, GAN COMPLEX, OPP. APSEB SUB- STATION, CHITTIVANI PALEM, VISAKAPATNAM
...PETITIONER
AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A P LTD REP BY CE
VSKPTM ANR, REP. BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
VISAKAPATNAM
ZONE,
KV
GAJUWAKA
SS
PREMISES. APTRANSCO, VISAKAPATNAM - 26.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER TRANSMISSION APTRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto call for records and issue an order or Direction one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the order of the first respondent dated 24-1-2013 bearing no. Lr.
NJS,J
W.P.NO.3506 OF 2013
No.CE/VSPZone/AP Transco/Tech/AE3/F. Doc/D.No. 391/13 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 4352 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the first respondent dated 24-01-2013 bearing Lr. No. CE/VSP
Zone/AP
Transco/Tech/AE3/F.Doc/D.No.
/13
pending
disposal of Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SURESH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO)
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
W.P.NO.3506 OF 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr.Ch.Ganesh, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the writ petition, the cause does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 03.03.2026
LSP