Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/286/2025 of SRI SAI NADHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Vs NIDADAVOLU HANUMANTHA RAO on 2 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 286/2025
APHC010244782025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 286/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI SAI NADHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, NAIDU MALAKONDAIAH C/O RAO AND NAIDU ENGINEERING COLLEGE, PRESENT HIT COLLEGE, SOUTH BYPASS ROAD (OLD TRUNK ROAD), ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.
2. NAIDU MALAKONDAIAH, S/O PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, SRI SAI NADHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, FLAT NO. 601, BLOCK NO. C.B.K ENCLAVE, OLD TRUNK ROAD, SOUTHERN SIDE OF RIMS HOSPITAL, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. NIDADAVOLU HANUMANTHA RAO, S/o Venkateswarlu Aged about 63 yearsOccupation Business R/o Bandlamitta, Ongole City, Ongole Mandal, Prakasham District
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. UNNAM SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. D.GAYATHRI The Court made the following:
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 286/2025 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Ms.Beeda Rashmitha Rani Yadav, learned counsel appears for the learned counsel for the appellant on record namely, Sri Unnam Sravan Kumar.
2. The appellants are the defendants in C.O.S.No.19 of 2023. Against them, C.E.P.No.02 of 2025 was filed for execution in the said suit.
3. In the Execution Petition, Full and Final Satisfaction memo has been recorded by the learned Special Court for Trial and Disposal of the Commercial Disputes, Vijayawada and the E.P has been terminated. The copy of the order dated 10.02.2026 in C.E.P.No.02 of 2025 in C.O.S.No.19 of 2023 has been brought on record.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view thereof, the appeal has lost its efficacy and may be dismissed as such.
5. Recording the same, the C.M.A is dismissed.
6. In view of the aforesaid, I.A.No.2 of 2026, filed for impleadment of the petitioner as the 2nd respondent, shall also stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 03.03.2026 Pab
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2025 DATE: 03.03.2026
Pab