Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22555/2023 of KOLLU RAVINDRA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 2 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22555/2023 Between: 1. KOLLU RAVINDRA, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 50
APHC010434892023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 22555/2023
Between:
1. KOLLU RAVINDRA, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 50 YEARS R/O.D.NO.
28/334, CIRCLE PETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI
GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, INTELLIGENCE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent in not granting 1plus1 personal security to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to provide 1plus1 personal security on payment basis in consonance with G.O.Rt.No.655 dated 13.03.1997 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith provide 1+1 personal security to the petitioner pending the writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner for the following relief: <.... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent in not granting 1+1 personal security to the petitioner as illegal arbitrary unjust unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondents to provide 1+1 personal security on payment basis in consonance with G.O.Rt.No.655, dated 13 03 1997 and pass ...=
Smt.A.Jayanti, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents placed on record the written instructions and would submit that petitioner herein is now serving as Minister for Mines, Geology and Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh and 1+1 personal security has already been provided to him based on the prevailing security assessment, according to law and would submit that the cause does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Sri V.R.N.Prashanth, learned counsel for the Petitioner did not oppose the said submission and no contra material placed on record. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 03.03.2026
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No.22555 of 2023
03.03.2026
Mjl /*