Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/361/2026 of K. MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Vs DEVANSHU KUMAR on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 361/2026 Between: 1. K. MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD, S/O. K. M. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 48
APHC010033492026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 361/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K. MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD, S/O. K. M. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. RES/AT FLAT NO.214, KIYSTAL CASTLE APARTMENT,
HAILAND ROAD, CHINAKAKANI, MANGALAGIRIMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. - 522508.
...PETITIONER AND
1. DEVANSHU KUMAR, The Competent Authority (Notaries)/ Under Secretary to the Govt, of India,, Notary Cell, Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, Middle Wing, 4th Floor, JanpathBhawan, Janpath, New Delhi - 110001.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience of the final order dated 06-11-2025 which was amended on 03- 12-2025 passed in W.P. No. 30486 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Allu Hari Narayana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Order passed by this Court in W.P.No.30486 of 2025 has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in this contempt case.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the contempt case stands closed. No order as to costs.
The Registry is directed to verify the serial Number of the writ petition, which is shown at Sl.No.80, in the cause list.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 03.03.2026 SCH
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 361/2026
Dated: 03.03.2026 SCH