Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24710/2018 of Vadicharla Kotireddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24710/2018 Between: 1. VADICHARLA KOTIREDDY,, S/O. V.KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
APHC010524422018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 24710/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VADICHARLA KOTIREDDY,, S/O. V.KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT, R/O.H.NO.4-17, KOTANEMALIPURI VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. VADICHARLA CHADRA SEKHAR REDDY,, S/O. V.KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.H.NO.4-17, KOTANEMALIPURI VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASA RAO PET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, BOLLAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any order or direction writ or writs more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not passing any orders on Appeal filed by the petitioners dated 19-09-2017 which is filed against endorsement Rc.322/2017-DT, dated 18- 09-2017 of the 4th respondent is as illegal arbitrary, malafide and violative of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and setaside the samein the interest of justice and equity and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct to 3rd respondent to pass orders on Appeal filed by the petitioners dated 19-09-2017 which is against the endorsement Rc.322/2017-DT, dated 18-09-2017 forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and equity and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file corrected translated copy of Ex.P8 in W.P.No. 24710 of 2018 and receive the same, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri K. Ashok, learned counsel representing Sri I. Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, with a liberty to question the proceedings of the 3rd respondent vide Rc.No.975/2026-G, 28.02.2026.
Permission is accorded to question the proceedings of the 3rd respondent vide Rc.No.975/2026-G, 28.02.2026.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 03.03.2026 SCH
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 24710/2018
Date: 03.03.2026 SCH