Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1354/2026 of Karri Durga Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 2 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1354/2026 Between: 1. KARRI DURGA RAO, S/O. SURYANARAYANA,AGED ABOUT 51
APHC010087462026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. KARRI DURGA RAO, S/O. SURYANARAYANA,AGED ABOUT 51
YEARS, R/O. H.NO.12-7-18.BALLALA VARI VEEDHI, KANAKA
DURGAMMA AALAYAM,ARYAPURAM, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM
URBAN MANDAL.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,THROUGH
STATION
HOUSE
OFFICER,III
TOWN
LO
POLICE
STATION,RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/accused no.2 on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in FIR.
No. 197/2024 on the file of III Town L&O Police Station, Rajahmahendravaram and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. N NIRMAL KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri N.Nirmal Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.03.2026. UPS
Dt.03.03.2026
UPS