Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/38656/2012 of G. APPA RAO, CHITTOOR DT. Vs SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,(OPERATIONS), TIRUPATI & ANR on 2 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 38656/2012 Between: 1. G. APPA RAO, CHITTOOR DT., S/O G.GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

APHC010523342012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION NO: 38656/2012

Between:

1. G. APPA RAO, CHITTOOR DT., S/O G.GANGAIAH, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O

D.NO.13-6-600/44/157-B,

P.K.LAYOUT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATIONS TIRUPATI

ANR, A.P.S.P.D.C.L, TIRUPATI.

2. THE

ASSISTANT

ENGINEER

OPERATIONS,

A.P.S.P.D.C.L,

OPERATION

CIRCLE,

P.K.LAYOUT,

TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Manamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not giving electricity connection to the premises D.No.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.Layout, Tirupati belonging to the petitioner, inspite of sanction of the 15`

respondent

vide

letter

NJS,J

W.P.NO.38656 OF 2012

No.SE/0/TPT/AEComml./F.No.27/D.No.1067/12 dated 2.5.2012, approval under regulation 43(3)

vide

letter

No.E.1/KN/TECH/HV/D.No.1284/2012

dated

23.5.2012

and

installation of the transformer etc., as illegal, arbitrary, improper and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondents to give electricity connection to the premises D.No.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.Layout, Tirupati belonging to the petitioner, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 49037 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith give connection of electricity supply to the premises

D. No.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.Layout, Tirupati belonging to the petitioner, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N BHARAT BABU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL

The Court made the following:

NJS,J

W.P.NO.38656 OF 2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Ms.P.Sai Bharathi, learned counsel representing Mr.N.Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the writ petition, the cause does not survive for adjudication.

2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 03.03.2026

LSP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead