Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11837/2012 of A. SATYA SREE, RAJAHMUNDRY Vs HON'BLE DIST JUDGE, E.G. DIST on 1 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11837/2012 Between: 1. A . SATYA SREE,
APHC010082592012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 11837/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A. SATYA SREE, RAJAHMUNDRY, W/O. LATE VENKATA KRISHNA PROCESS SERVER R/O. RATNA BHAVAN, 25-5-5/2, JAIKRISHNA PURARN, RAJAHMUNDRY
...PETITIONER AND
1. HONBLE DIST JUDGE E G DIST, East Godavari District, at Rajahmundry
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent in not considering the petitioner for appointment in any ministerial post on compassionate grounds as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the spirit of compassionate appointments and consequently direct the respondent consider the petitioner for appointment in any ministerial post in the unit of District Judge, East Godavari District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 14903 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent to consider the representation dt. 11.10.2011 for appointment in any ministerial post pending WP. and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KS Naveen Counsel for the Respondent:
1. POSANI VENKATESWARLU (SC FOR APHC)
The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no instructions from his client.
In any event, this case is posted for dismissal, and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
_________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date:02.03.2026 MJA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 11837/2012
Date:02.03.2026 MJA