Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7189/2019 of Vongivarapu Koteswararao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7189/2019 Between: 1. VONGIVARAPU KOTESWARARAO,, S/OKOTESWARARAO, OCC. COOLIE, AGE
APHC010166352019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 7189/2019
Between:
1. VONGIVARAPU KOTESWARARAO,, S/OKOTESWARARAO, OCC. COOLIE, AGE 35 YEARS, CASTE SC.,R/O. H.NO. 14-2- 787, 7TH WARD, MACHERLA-522426 GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. M. SIVA SANKAR,, S/O. NOT KNOWN MACHERLA-522426
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 7TH WARD, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. B.VEERANJANEYULU,, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCCUPATION
COOLIE, 7TH WARD, MACHERLA-522426 GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,
AMARAVATHI, A.P
2. THE D S P GURAZALA, , GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE S H O, MACHERLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. MADDIGAPU
CHINA
VENKATARAMIREDDY,
S/O.RAMA
CHANDRA REDDY, CASTE REDDY, 7TH WARD, ROOPLINE
COLONY, DOOR NO.14-2-809, MACHERLA, GUNTUR
DISTRICT A.P.
5. MADDIGAPU SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O.RAMA CHANDRA
REDDY, CASTE REDDY, 7TH WARD, ROOPLINE COLONY, DOOR NO.14-2-809, MACHERLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondents 2 and 3 in filing the
criminals cases against respondents 4 and 5. It is illegal , arbitratry and consequently direct the respondents 2nd and 3rd to file a criminals cases against the respondents 4 and 5. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3 to file criminal cases on respondents 4 and 5, in the insterest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. .
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.7189 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
As Sri K. Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, is no more, notices were sent to the writ petitioners. As per the Registry report, the notice sent to the 1st petitioner was served; however, none entered appearance. Notices sent to petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 were returned un-served, though the notices were sent to them at the addresses provided in the cause title.
2. On the earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioners and, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption <For Dismissal.= Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioners.
3. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos. 1 to 3, is present and has placed on record the written instructions and submitted that the present writ petition has been filed seeking police protection. He submitted that the police conducted a preliminary enquiry and also addressed a letter to the Tahsildar requesting particulars of the subject land. Later, the police registered a case in Crime No. 187 of 2019 under Sections 420, 468, and 471 read with 34 of the IPC and investigated the matter. After completion of the investigation, the matter was found to be false, vide C.C. No. 73/Ref/SDPO-GZL/2024 dated 02.09.2024, issued by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gurazala.
4. Therefore, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the report of the police, their remedy is to approach the learned Magistrate for necessary redressal in accordance with law.
5. In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 2nd March, 2026 cbn
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.7189 of 2019
2nd March, 2026
cbn