Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/817/2004 of Majeti Balarama Krishna @ Balaram Vs General Manager, on 1 March 2026
& BM,J CMA. NOS.817 OF 2004 & 252 OF 2017) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 817 of 2004 & 252 of 2017 COMMON JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) These appeals have been filed
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 817 of 2004 & 252 of 2017
COMMON JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
These appeals have been filed by the appellant/plaintiff, being aggrieved from the dismissal of his suits by order dated 18.03.2003 passed in O.S.No.307 of 1994 and O.S.No.310 of 1994 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada.
2. On 16.12.2025 the following order was passed:
“A request has been made on behalf of the appellant’s counsel to get the latest instructions. She submits that the matter has been settled.
2. List next week finally under the same caption.”
3. On 23.12.2025 the following order was passed:
“Sri L.Radha Krishna, learned counsel appears for the appellants’ counsel and seeks for one more opportunity to obtain instructions. He submits that the letter has been sent to the appellants seeking instructions, which are awaited.
2. Post after Sankranthi Vacation-2026.”
4. Sri L. Radha Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that instructions have not been received from the appellant despite the letter dated 20.12.2025, which was delivered on 23.12.2025, consequently he is not able to advance the arguments in appeal.
5. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
___________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date :02.03.2026. RPD.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
(DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION)
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 817 of 2004 & 252 of 2017
Date: 02.03.2026
RPD.