Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/692/2019 of Nambaru Srinivasarao, S/o Tirupatayya Vs THE STATE OF AP on 1 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 692/2019 Between: 1. NAMBARU SRINIVASARAO, S/O TIRUPATAYYA, RESIDENT OF LANKALAPALEM
APHC010015802019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 692/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NAMBARU SRINIVASARAO, S/O TIRUPATAYYA, RESIDENT OF LANKALAPALEM VILLAGE, PARWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT OF A.P., AMARAVATHY, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, PARAWADA MANDAL
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with rastha/ pathway from the lands in Sy.No. 131/1A, 1B and 1C to the lands in Sy.No. 130/2A, 2B and 2C and Sy.No. 128/1 to 9 of Mantripalem Village,
JS,J W.P.No.692/2019
Parwada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim orders restraining the 4th respondent, his staff/officials from interfering with rastha/ pathway from the lands in Sy.No. 131/1A, 1B and 1C to the lands in Sy.No. 130/2A, 2B and 2C and Sy.No. 128/1 to 9 of Mantripalem Village, Parwada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS,J W.P.No.692/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
The writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering into the rastha/pathway in the lands in Sy.No.131/1A, 1B and 1C to the lands in Sy.No. 130/2A, 2B and 2C and Sy.No. 128/1 to 9 of Mantripalem Village, Parwada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
3. Perused the record.
4. Since this Court cannot go into the dispute with regard to the pathway, it is open to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum.
5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.03.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 692/2019
Dated: 02.03.2026
RSD