Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11/2013 of Sri Ganapathi Venkataramana Rice Mill, Vs The Govt. of A.P rep by A.P.Transco, on 1 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.11 OF 2013 Between: Sri Ganapathi Venkataramana Rice Mill, rep by its Prop. Tanakala Ranga Rao,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.11 OF 2013
Between:
Sri Ganapathi Venkataramana Rice Mill, rep by its Prop. Tanakala Ranga Rao, S/o.late Sri Govindarajulu, Hindu, Business, aged 74 years, Srirangapatnam. E.G.District.
...Petitioner
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Govt. of A.P., rep by A.P.Transco, Rep by its Managing Director, Vidyuth Soudha, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, and three others. ...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajesh Babu Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.P.Anand Seshu,
Standing Counsel for APEPDCL
2 WP_11_2013 The Court made the following ORDER:
Ms.P.Saraswathi, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The interim order granted earlier stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petition pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J March 02, 2026 vasu