Andhra Pradesh High Court
TREVC/41/2008 of THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VISAKHAPATNAM. Vs M/S. LANCO PACKERS, GUNTUR. on 1 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR TAX REVISION CASE NO: 41/2008 Between: 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA
APHC010238872008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
TAX REVISION CASE NO: 41/2008
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VISAKHAPATNAM., REP. BY THE STATE REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE STAT MEGHANA TOWERS, 4TH FLOOR, OPP. GURUDWAR BUS STOP,
...PETITIONER AND
1. M/S LANCO PACKERS GUNTUR, Guntur.
...RESPONDENT to take the TRC on file and set aside the order of the Hon'ble STAT., Visakhapatnam in TA.No.106 /2005 dt.28-08-2007. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(TREVCMP 680 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DANTU SRINIVAS( SPL SC FOR CT) Counsel for the Respondent:
1. SPECIAL GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAXES - I (AP)
RRR,J & TCDS,J TREVC.No.41 of 2008 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, by its order, dated 28.08.2007, had remanded the matter back to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, for verification as to whether the Appeal, had been filed within time, by the respondent and to verify whether the acknowledgment of receipt of the consequential order of the Commercial Tax Officer by the respondent, would extend limitation.
2. In view of the passage of time, this Court is of the view that the said order worked itself out and nothing further survives in the present Revision Case.
3. Accordingly, this Tax Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
_________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date:02.03.2026 KPV
RRR,J & TCDS,J TREVC.No.41 of 2008
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
TAX REVISION CASE No.41 of 2008 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
02.03.2026
KPV