Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6081/2019 of Ch. Rusheshwara Raju Vs THE STATE OF AP on 1 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6081/2019 Between: 1. CH. RUSHESHWARA RAJU, S/O. VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED 92 YEARS,
APHC010139762019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6081/2019
Between:
1. CH. RUSHESHWARA RAJU, S/O. VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED
92 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-7, KOSURU VILLAGE, MOVVA
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUCHIPUDI, MOVVA
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. CH JYOTHI, W/O. LATE SRINIVASA RAJU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.5-7,
KOSURU
VILLAGE,
MOVVA
MANDAL,
KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. CH BHANU, S/O. LATE SRINIVASA RAJU, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.5-7,
KOSURU
VILLAGE,
MOVVA
MANDAL,
KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, Direction more particularly one the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent herein in not registering the complaint Dt.08.04.2019 given by the petitioner against respondents 5 and 6 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to forthwith register the complaint dt.08.04.2019 against respondents 5
and 6 and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to forthwith register the complaint dt.08.04.2019 made by the petitioner against respondents 5
and 6, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V VINOD K REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.6081 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel representing Sri V.Vinod K. Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 02.03.2026 Pmk
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:6081 OF 2019
Date: 02.03.2026
Pmk