Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/585/2026 of NADIKUDITI ASHOK CHAITANYA Vs KUNA ATCHIMMA on 26 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 585/2026 Between: 1. NADIKUDITI ASHOK
APHC010091402026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 585/2026
Between:
1. NADIKUDITI ASHOK CHAITANYA, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O. FERRY VILLAGE, IBRAHIMPATNAM
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KUNA ATCHIMMA, W/O. LATE NAGIREDDY, AGED 78 YEARS, R/O.
CHANDRAGUDEM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA
2. SHAIK SALAR, S/O. LATE RANJAN SAHEB, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O.
D. NO. 3-40, OLD CHANDRA GUDEM, CHANDRAGUDEM POST, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 230.
3. SHAIK KHADAR BABA, S/O. SALAR, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.
3-40,
OLD
CHANDRAGUDEM,
CHANDRAGUDEM
POST,
MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 230.
4. PONAMALA RAJA VARMA, S/O. NAGARAJU, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O.
D. NO. 62-7-8, PATAMATA LANKA, OLD RAMALAYAM STREET, VIJAYAWADA - 520 010.
5. MADEM SIVA SANKAR, S/O. CHINNA ANJAIAH, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.
CHANDRAGUDEM,
MYLAVARAM
MANDAL,
KRISHNA
6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, O/O. THE
TAHSILDAR, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 230.
7. THE TAHSILDAR, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT - 521 230.
8. THE SUBREGISTRAR, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521 230.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toBeing aggrieved by the non-disposal of I.A. No.43 of 2022 in O.S.
No. 7 of 2022 on the file of the Court of learned Junior Civil Judge, Mylavaram, the above-named petitioner prefers this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Having regard to the limited grievance of the petitioner in this revision petition that the interlocutory application in I.A.No.43 of 2022 in O.S.No.7 of 2022 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge at Mylavaram, whereunder an exparte ad-interim injunction was granted against him, is not being disposed of, inspite of the fact that the petitioner herein has filed his counter in the said interlocutory application, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Junior Civil Judge, Mylavaram to hear the said interlocutory application expeditiously and dispose of the same on merits according to law within two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 27.02.2026 ARR
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 585/2026
Date: 27.02.2026
ARR