Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/550/2026 of MATTA VENKATA RATTAIAH Vs MATTA PANDURANGA RAO (DIED) on 26 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 550/2026 Between: 1. MATTA VENKATA
APHC010068582026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 550/2026
Between:
1. MATTA VENKATA RATTAIAH, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, PROPERTIES, R/O KOTHA MAJERU
CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MATTA PANDURANGA RAO DIED, (DIED)
2. MALTA HARINADHA BABU, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. CULTIVATION, R/O KOTHA MAJERU
CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.,
3. MORLA SITAMAHALAKSHMI, W/O LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 212, BANK VIHAR
APARTMENTS, PLOT NO 16, SEATER-22, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI
4. MALTA NARAYANAMMA DIED, (DIED)
5. MALTA LOKANADHAM, S/O MALTA HARINADHA BABU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM.
6. MALTA PADMA, , W/O LATE GOPALA RAO (IS DECEASED S/O
PANDURANGA RAO) HINDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. HOUSE
WIFE, R/O D.NO 14-122/8 EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM.
7. MALTA RAJASEKHAR, S/O LATE GOPALA RAO, HINDU, AGED
ABOUT 31 YEARS. PVT., EMPLOYEE R/O D. NO 14-122/8, EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM.
8. MATTA SATISH, S/O LATE GOPALA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT
29 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO 14-122/8, EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM.
9. LUKKA MANGAMMA, D/O MATTA PANDURANGA RAO, D/O
MATTA PANDURANGA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.
CHILDREN PROTECTION, R/O D.NO 3-84, KOTHA MAJERU, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT,
10. MATTA
NAGAMALLESWARAMM,
M/O
LATE
LOKANADHAM
HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O D. NO 3-84, KOTHA
MAJERU, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.,
11. MATTA SWATHI, W/O LATE LOKANADHAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT
46 YEARS. PROPERTIES R/O D.NO 14/442, NEAR SAKTHI
TEMPLE, EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM.
12. MATTA SURYA VINAY, S/O LATE LOKANADHAM HINDU, AGED
ABOUT 46 YEARS. PROPERTIES, R/O D.NO 14/442, NEAR
SAKTHI TEMPLE, EDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to set aside the docket proceedings dated 29.01.2026 passed in I.A No No 846 of 2025 in O.S.No.364 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, subsequently to allow the I.A No No 846 of 2025 in O.S.No.364 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all the further proceedings in O.S. No; 364 of 2010
on the file of the court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge Machilipatnam, Krishna District pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition and pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The only grievance of the revision petitioner is that the interlocutory application filed by him in I.A.No.846 of 2025 in O.S.No.364 of 2010 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, to send Ex.B.2-Will dated 01.08.1996 to the Handwriting Expert for examination, is not being considered and disposed of by the trial Court in a suit that was filed in the year 2010.
3. Therefore, having regard to the said limited grievance of the revision petitioner, notice to the respondents is dispensed with and the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, to hear both the parties in I.A.No.846 of 2025 in O.S.No.364 of 2010 and dispose of the said petition expeditiously on merits according to law within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 27.02.2026 ARR
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 550/2026
Date: 27.02.2026
ARR