Andhra Pradesh High Court
SA/179/2026 of BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALU Vs NANDIGAMA ADI LAKSHMI on 26 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY SECOND APPEAL NO: 179/2026 Between: 1. BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI
APHC010054022026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
SECOND APPEAL NO: 179/2026
Between:
1. BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALU, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. RESIDENT OF D NO. 1-54, DODDIPATLA, SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. NANDIGAMA ADI LAKSHMI, W/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, HINDU, A/A 74 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-79/1, GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, MUSUNURU
MANDAL,
PRESENTLY
ELURU
DISTRICT.
..RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
2. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, A/A 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal under section ___________ against ordersThe above appellants beg to present this memorandum of grounds of Second Appeal being aggrieved by the Decree and Judgement Dt.29-01-2026 in A.S 63/2024 on the file of XI Addl. District Judge Court at Gudiwada by Confirnning the Decree and Judgement Dt.14-10-2024 in O.S.No.59/2018, on the file of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court, Kaikaluru, for the following among other grounds.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filling of certified copy of decree and judgment in O.S.No.59/2018 and receive main second appeal on file, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant Stay of all further proceedings of EP 01/2025 in OS 59/2018
of the file of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court Kaikaluru till disposal of the second appeal in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. KRISHNA MURTHY SUNKARA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The suit was filed for declaration of title and for recovery of possession on the basis of a registered gift deed executed in favour of the plaintiff by the original owner of the property in question. It was subsequently unilaterally cancelled by the executant without the knowledge of the plaintiff. Therefore, she has filed the suit for declaration of her title and for recovery of possession. The suit was decreed by the trial Court. The Court held that unilateral cancellation of a conditional gift is not valid under law and the gift in favour of the plaintiff holds good and thereby declared her title to the property and ordered for recovery of possession. The said judgment was challenged by the defendants before the first appellate Court. The first appellate Court concurred with the findings of the trial Court and dismissed the appeal. Thus, concurrent findings are recorded against the defendants by both the fact finding Courts answering the legal aspects involved in the suit correctly. Therefore, no question of law is involved in the second appeal, much less any such substantial question of law is made out to admit the appeal for hearing.
3. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 27.02.2026 ARR
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
SECOND APPEAL NO: 179/2026
Date: 27.02.2026
ARR