Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/576/2026 of VETSA GEETHA Vs KAMINENI SAMBASIVA RAO on 26 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 576/2026 Between: 1. VETSA GEETHA,

APHC010062592026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 576/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. VETSA GEETHA, (DIED)(SOLE PLAINTIFF)

2. RENDUCHINTHALA SURYA KIRAN, S/O. LATE BABURAO, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O 1-3/26-13, NEAR VENKATESWARASWAMY TEMPLE,

VIDYADHARA PURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520012.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. KAMINENI SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O PERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.MC-342, P.V.TOWNSHIP, MALLARAM, MANGURU MANDAL, KHAMMAM DISTRICT, TELANGANA.

2. CHALASANI SIVA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.72-2-4, SF-303, KONERUVARI STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. MANDAVA CHILAKA RANI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED

VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.

4. MADDUKURI JYOTHI RANI, W/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. D. NO 10-5-3/2/3/G, 203, ROSE ENCLAVE, FIRST LANCER ROAD, MASAB TANK, UCO BANK COLONY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500028 5.

5. VALLURU RAJANI, W/O. LATE RAMESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.64-9-17, CHENNUPATI RAMA KOTAIAH STREET PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

6. VALLRU SHEETAL, .D/O LATE RAMESH BABU, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.64-9-7, CHENNUPATI RAMA KOTAIAH STREET PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRIC

7. VALLURU GIRISHCHANDRA, S/O. LATE RAMESH BABU, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.64-9-7, CHENNUPATI RAMA KOTAIAH STREET, PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

8.

8. VALLURU CHETAN SUSHEEL, S/O. LATE RAMESH BABU, AGED 23 YEAR, R/O. D.NO.64-9-7, CHENNUPATI RAMA KOTAIAH STREET, PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

9.

9. VALLURU NAGA MALLIKA, D/O. NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.64-9-7, CHENNUPATI RAMA KOTAIAH STREET, PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

10. MANDAVA SRI SRAVYA, D/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED

VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

11. MANDAVA ANIRUDH, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.N.40-25-17/8A, 2F-303, SRI LAKSHMI SAI HOME APARTMENTS, NETHAJI STREET, PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

12. MANDAVA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMA RAO, AGED

VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

13. VALLURU VAMSI RAMESH, S/O LATE RAMESH BABU, AGED ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O. D.NO.64-9-17, CHENNUPATI RAMAKOTAIAH STREET, PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

14. M/S SRI HOMES, VIJAYAWADA,

REGISTERED FIRM, REGISTRATION NO.317/2017, FIRST FLOOR, D-ADDRESS MALL, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. 15.

15. CHERUKURI SATISH BABU, S/O. LATE C.V. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O. D.NO.32-9-11 A, MOGALRAJPURAM VIJAYAWADA. 16

16. DHULIPALA SRIKANTH, S/O. LATE D. RAMA CHANDRA KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.32-16-3, MOGALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA.

17. GUDURU NAGA PRASAD, S/O. KANAKA DURGA PRASAD, AGED 28 YEARS. DOOR NO.52-1/9-4, F2, FIFTH FLOOR, SURYA TOWERS, NTR COLONY, VIJAYAWADA.

18. SUNKARA PUJITHA, W/O. GURU NAGA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.52-1/9-4, F2, FIFTH FLOOR, SURYA TOWERS, NTR COLONY, VIJAYAWADA. 19.

19. BADIGA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, TRENDSET VANTAGE, 8-2-709/1/D-3, D BLOCK, FLOOR. ROAD NO. 14, BANJARA FLILLS, FLYDERABAD, TELANGANA- 500034.

20. BADIGA SUMANTH, /O. BADIGA RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, TRENDSET VANTAGE, 8-2-709/1/D-3, D BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR. ROAD NO.14,

BANJARA FLILLS, FLYDERABAD, TELANGANA-500034.

21. GULLAPALLI VENKATA SATHYARAKESHWAR, S/O PANDURANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O 105, CONSTABLE ROAD, AYANAVARAM, CHENNAI - 600023.

22. BELLAM SIVA PRASAD, S/O RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O 8-2-684/1/8 AND 11/1, ROAD NO.12, BANJARA HILLS, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA- 500034.

23. PINNAMANENI KRISHNAIAH, S/O MADUSUDHANA RAO AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O 60-3-26/1, SAIANKITH APARTMENT, FLAT NO.3F-403, ITI BUS STOP, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520008

24. PINNAMANENI USHA RANI, W/O PINNAMANENI KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O 60-3-26/1, SAI ANKITH APARTMENT, FLAT NO.3F-403, I.T.I BUS STOP, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520008.

25. KATAMANENI RAM, S/O DURGA PRASADA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 28-16-5, CHINTAVARI STREET, NEAR RAMA MANDIR, ARUNDELPET, VIJAYAWADA.

26. DEVINENI NANHA RAM, S/O LATE D.RAJA RAM, AGED ABOUT, 69 YEARS, R/O FLAT.NO.201, GREEN VIEW APARTMENTS, DOOR.NO.52-1/12-8/2, 4TH LANE, VETERINARY COLONY, VIJAYAWADA-520008.

27. KATRAGADDA VENKATA NARAYANA, S/O. RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O FLAT.NO.T-4, HANUMAN TOWERS, ROAD NO.3, VETERINARY COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

28. KATRAGADDA KRISHNA TEJ, S/O. KATRAGADDA VENKATA NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O FLAT.NO.T-4, HANUMAN TOWERS, ROAD NO.3, VETERINARY COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 29.

29. ST JOHNS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, T. SUMAN, R/O. DONKA ROAD, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

30. THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, GOVERNORPET BRANCH, C.S.I .COMPLEX, SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA - 520002.

31. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PANTAKALAVA ROAD, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. 32.

32. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the Common Order dated 18.11.2025 made in I.A. No. 687 of 2023 in O.S.No.30 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the Honble

VII Addl. District Judge, Vijayawada dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner Under Order I Rule 10 Order XXII Rule 10 and Section 151 C.P.C, the above named petitioners humbly begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition for the following among other IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Order and Decretal Order dated 18.11.2025 passed in I.A. No.687/2023 in O.S. No.30/2021 on the file of the Hon’ble VII Addl. District Judge, Vijayawada and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. NIRMALBABU A Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

2. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

This revision is directed against the order dated 18.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.687 of 2023 in O.S.No.30 of 2021 on the file of learned VII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, whereby the petition filed by the revision petitioner under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “CPC”) to implead him as a party to the suit after the death of the sole plaintiff in the said suit was dismissed.

2. At the time of hearing the revision petition, Sri M.R.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the respondents, would submit that the suit was instituted by the sole plaintiff and the said suit was dismissed for default on 26.11.2025 and the suit itself is not on the file of the trial Court now and as such, this petition to implead the petitioner as a party to the said suit became infructuous.

3. The fact that the said suit was dismissed for default on 26.11.2025 is not disputed and denied by the revision petitioner herein. He also admits that the said suit was dismissed for default on 26.11.2025. No steps are taken to restore the said suit on to the file of the trial Court. Therefore, when the suit itself is not on the file of the trial Court, the petition filed under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC to implead him as a party-plaintiff in the said suit became infructuous.

4. If at all, it is the case of the petitioner herein that the sole plaintiff in the said suit executed a Will in his favour and that he subsequently died, he has to file a separate suit for redressal of his grievance on the basis of the said Will, if he so advised and entitled.

5. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 27.02.2026 ARR

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 576/2026

Date: 27.02.2026

ARR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead