Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/3077/2025 of DESU SRINIVASA RAO Vs SRIRAMULA SAROJA on 26 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3077/2025 Between: 1. DESU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. VENKATA SAMBA SIVA
APHC010539832025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3077/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DESU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. VENKATA SAMBA SIVA RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. 22-11-53, BOSE ROAD, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRIRAMULA SAROJA, W/o.Radha Krishna Murthy, aged about 63 years, R/o. 27-1-223, Balaji Nagar, Nellore, Nellore District
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order dated 22-09-2025 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Tenali, in I.A. No. 886/2024 in O.S. No. 37/2024 and allow this Civil Revision Petition by dismissing I.A. No. 886/2024 in O.S. No. 37/2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 37/2024 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Tenali and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KANADHI BHATLA SRINIVASA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and nothing further survives in the case.
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
27.02.2026
MJA
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3077/2025
27.02.2026
MJA