Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1106/2022 of SRI VASIREDDY SATYANARAYANA Vs PRASANNA VENKATESH on 25 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1106/2022 Between: 1. SRI VASIREDDY SATYANARAYANA, S/O VASIREDDY PEDA
APHC010160522022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1106/2022
Between:
1. SRI VASIREDDY SATYANARAYANA, S/O VASIREDDY
PEDA
PULLAIAH,AGED
YEARS,1-61,MAIN
ROAD,BANDAMCHERLA
VILLAGE,T.NARASAPURAM
MANDALAM,JAGGAVARAM,WEST
GODAVARI
DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PRASANNA VENKATESH, District Collector,West Godavari District,At Eluru
...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D S N V PRASAD BABU
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. S SRAVANA SANDHYA
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
C.C.NO.1106 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr.D.S.N.V. Prasad Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the contempt case, the cause does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 26.02.2026 LSP