Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/39673/2018 of Peyyala Anthony Kamalamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 25 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39673/2018 Between: 1. PEYYALA ANTHONY KAMALAMMA, W/O JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 61
APHC010822252018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 39673/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PEYYALA ANTHONY KAMALAMMA, W/O JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.15-94, HOUSE OF B.NARASIMHA RAO, BODAPADU, HAMLET OF NUNNA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, NUNNA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue the Writ order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents under letter dated 01-04-2017 refusing to cancel un-possessory agreement of sale-cum-Power of Attorney dated 23-02-2015 bearing document No.529/2015 which is found fraudulent in the enquiry conducted under Section 82 and 83 of Registration Act by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of
JS,J W.P.No.39673/2018
provisions of Registration Act and the rules made thereunder and consequently direct the respondents to cancel the document No. 529/2015 dated 23-02-2015 forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to make suitable entries regarding the document No. 529/2015 dated 23-02-2015 pursuant to the enquiry under Sec.82 and 83 of Registration Act pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
JS,J W.P.No.39673/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no more and requested to dismiss the writ petition as abated.
In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. However, liberty is granted to the legal representatives of the deceased/petitioner to reopen the matter if the cause survives. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 26.02.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 39673/2018
Dated: 26.02.2026
RSD